[1]
Bent, I. and Drabkin, W. 1987. Analysis. Macmillan.
[2]
Borgerding, T.M. 2002. Gender, sexuality, and early music. Routledge.
[3]
Borgerding, T.M. ed. 2002. Gender, sexuality, and early music. Routledge.
[4]
Chafe, E.T. 1992. Monteverdi’s tonal language. Schirmer Books.
[5]
Cook, N. 1987. A guide to musical analysis. Dent.
[6]
Cook, N. 1994. A guide to musical analysis. Oxford University Press.
[7]
Dahlhaus, C. 1990. Studies on the origin of harmonic tonality. Princeton University Press.
[8]
Dunsby, J. 1993. Early twentieth century music: models of musical analysis. Blackwell.
[9]
Dunsby, J. and Whittall, A. 1988. Music analysis in theory and practice. Faber Music.
[10]
Forte, Allen The structure of atonal music / Allen Forte. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1977.
[11]
Lester, J. 1989. Analytic approaches to twentieth-century music. W.W.Norton.
[12]
McClary, S. 2004. Modal subjectivities: self-fashioning in the Italian madrigal. University of California Press.
[13]
McClary, Susan. 2004. Modal subjectivities: self-fashioning in the Italian madrigal. University of California Press.
[14]
Meier, B. 1988. The modes of classical vocal polyphony: described according to the sources, with revisions by the author. Broude Brothers.
[15]
Pearsall, E. 2012. Twentieth-century music theory and practice. Routledge.
[16]
Stein, B. 2002. Carissimi’s Tonal System and the Function of Transposition in the Expansion of Tonality. Journal of Musicology. 19, 2 (Apr. 2002), 264–305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/jm.2002.19.2.264.
[17]
Stein, B.A. 1994. Between key and mode: tonal practice in the music of Giacomo Carissimi. UMI.
[18]
Straus, J.N. 2005. Introduction to post-tonal theory. Prentice Hall.
[19]
Susan McClary. The Transition from Modal to Tonal Organization in the Works of Monteverdi.’ Ph.D. diss, Harvard University, 1976.
[20]
Wiering, F. 2015. The language of the modes: studies in the history of polyphonic modality. Routledge.
