1.
Altman R. Film/genre. London: British Film Institute; 1999.
2.
Grant BK. Film genre reader IV. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press; 2012.
3.
Grant BK. Film genre reader IV. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press; 2012.
4.
Wright W. Six guns and society: a structural study of the Western. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1977.
5.
Bordwell D, Thompson K, Smith J. Film art: an introduction. Eleventh edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.
6.
Cook P, editor. The cinema book. Third edition. London: BFI; 2007.
7.
Geiger J, Rutsky RL. Film analysis: a Norton reader. Second edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 2013.
8.
Keller S. Frustrated Climaxes: On Maya Deren’s Meshes of the Afternoon and Witch’s Cradle. Cinema Journal. 2013;52(3):75–98.
9.
Sitney PA. Visionary film: the American avant-garde, 1943-2000. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
10.
P. Adams Sitney. Visionary Film : The American Avant-Garde, 1943-2000 [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/reader.action?docID=241285&ppg=11
11.
Stone R, Gutiérrez-Albilla JD, editors. A companion to Luis Buñuel. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
12.
Rob Stone, , Juli?n Daniel Guti?rrez-Albilla, , and Julian Daniel Gutierrez-Albilla. A Companion to Luis Buñuel [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/reader.action?docID=1129776&ppg=5
13.
Deren M, Nichols B. Maya Deren and the American avant-garde. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2001.
14.
Carroll, Noel. Avant-Garde Film and Film Theory. Avant-Garde Film and Film Theory [Internet]. 1979;(4):135–143. Available from: http://bham-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest1295098707&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest1295098707&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%2844BIR_PDA1_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_ETH1_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_LGUI_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_PURE_FT%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_ALEPH_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_MIM_DS+%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_RLIST_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_ML_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_SFX_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_DR1_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_DR2_DS%29%2C44BIR_Ebsco_1%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&mode=Basic&vid=44BIR_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&vl(freeText0)=Avant-Garde%20Film%20and%20Film%20Theory%20Carroll&dum=true&dstmp=1513740032538
15.
Dixon WW, Foster GA. Experimental cinema, the film reader. London: Routledge; 2002.
16.
Hatfield J, Littman S, editors. Experimental film and video: an anthology [Internet]. New Bernet, Herts, [England]: John Libbey Publishing; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=2042367
17.
Littman S, Hatfield J. Experimental Film and Video: An Anthology [Internet]. Bloomington, IN: John Libbey Pub; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=2042367
18.
CARROLL N. Movies, the Moral Emotions, and Sympathy. Midwest Studies In Philosophy. 2010 Sep 8;34(1):1–19.
19.
Radley E. Terrible Pleasures or Pleasurable Terrors? The Psychotic Act of Horror Film Spectatorship. Nottingham French Studies. 2007 Sep;46(3):92–108.
20.
Allen R. Projecting illusion: film spectatorship and the impression of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
21.
DADLEZ EM. Seeing and Imagination: Emotional Response to Fictional Film. Midwest Studies In Philosophy. 2010 Sep 8;34(1):120–135.
22.
Lee S. Wes Anderson’s ambivalent film style: the relation between - - and emotion. New Review of Film and Television Studies. 2016 Oct;14(4):409–439.
23.
GAUT B. Empathy and Identification in Cinema. Midwest Studies In Philosophy. 2010 Sep 8;34(1):136–157.
24.
SH-Coding.pdf [Internet]. Available from: http://faculty.georgetown.edu/irvinem/theory/SH-Coding.pdf
25.
Pribram ED. Female spectators: looking at film and television. London: Verso; 1988.
26.
Grossberg L, Nelson C, Treichler PA. Cultural studies. New York: Routledge; 1992.
27.
Grossberg L, Grossberg L, Nelson C, Treichler PA, Baughman L, Wise JM. Cultural studies [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 1992. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=1122888
28.
Fernando Solanas and Octavio Getino. TOWARD A THIRD CINEMA. Cinéaste [Internet]. Cineaste Publishers, Inc.; 1970;4(3):1–10. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41685716?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=third&searchText=cinema&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dthird%2Bcinema%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
29.
Outsiders_-The-Battle-of-Algiers-and-political-cinema.pdf [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cronistas.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Outsiders_-The-Battle-of-Algiers-and-political-cinema.pdf
30.
For an imperfect cinema by Julio García Espinosa, trans. by Julianne Burton [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/onlinessays/JC20folder/ImperfectCinema.html
31.
Eid H, Ghazel K. Footprints of Fanon in Gillo Pontecorvo’s The Battle of Algiers and Sembene Ousamne’s Xala. English in Africa. 2009 May 20;35(2).
32.
Hill L, Olsson GH. Concerning violence: nine scenes from the anti-imperialistic self-defense. [London]: Dogwoof; 2015.
33.
Galt, Rosalind. Pretty: Film and the Decorative Image. 2011; Available from: http://findit.bham.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_mla2011031545&indx=1&recIds=TN_mla2011031545&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%2844BIR_PDA1_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_ETH1_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_LGUI_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_PURE_FT%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_ALEPH_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_MIM_DS+%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_RLIST_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_ML_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_SFX_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_DR1_DS%29%2Cscope%3A%2844BIR_DR2_DS%29%2C44BIR_Ebsco_1%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&mode=Basic&vid=44BIR_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&vl(freeText0)=pretty%20rosalind%20galt&dum=true&dstmp=1504605725877
34.
Cine-Tracts 2: Vol. 1, No. 2, Summer 1977 - CT02.pdf [Internet]. Available from: https://library.brown.edu/cds/cinetracts/CT02.pdf
35.
Grant BK. Film genre reader IV. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press; 2012.
36.
Brevik-Zender H. Let Them Wear Manolos: Fashion, Walter Benjamin, and Sofia Coppola’s Marie Antoinette. Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies. 2011 Jan 1;26(3 78):1–33.
37.
Cameron I, Pye D. The Movie book of the western. London: Studio Vista; 1996.
38.
Galt R. Pretty: film and the decorative image [Internet]. New York: Columbia University Press; 2011. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/Product/Index/792191?page=0
39.
Rich BR. New queer cinema: the director’s cut. Durham: Duke University Press; 2013.
40.
Rich BR. New queer cinema: the director’s cut [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=1173623
41.
QUEER AND PRESENT DANGER. Sight and Sound [Internet]. 10. Available from: https://search-proquest-com.ezproxyd.bham.ac.uk/docview/1305510453/fulltextPDF/C3BAD7840B704099PQ/1?accountid=8630
42.
Dyer R, Pidduck J. Now you see it: studies on lesbian and gay film. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2003.
43.
Dyer R, Pidduck J. Now you see it: studies in lesbian and gay film. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2003.
44.
Aaron M. New queer cinema: a critical reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2004.
45.
Rich BR. New queer cinema: the director’s cut [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=1173623
46.
Eng DL, Halberstam J, Muñoz JE. What’s queer about queer studies now? Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2005.
47.
Vol 11, No 2 (2007) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.film-philosophy.com/index.php/f-p/issue/view/13
48.
Downing L, Saxton L. Film and ethics: foreclosed encounters. London: Routledge; 2010.
49.
Downing L, Saxton L. Film and ethics: foreclosed encounters [Internet]. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=449453
50.
Cooper S, Modern Humanities Research Association. Selfless cinema?: ethics and French documentary. London: Legenda; 2005.
51.
PLANTINGA C. "I Followed the Rules, and They All Loved You More”: Moral Judgment and Attitudes toward Fictional Characters in Film. Midwest Studies In Philosophy. 2010 Sep 8;34(1):34–51.
52.
Aaron M. Spectatorship: the power of looking on. London: Wallflower; 2007.
53.
Davis LJ, editor. The disability studies reader. Fifth edition. New York, NY: Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.
54.
Davis LJ. The disability studies reader [Internet]. Fifth edition. New York, New York: Routledge; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=4741427
55.
McRuer R. AS GOOD AS IT GETS: Queer Theory and Critical Disability. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 2003 Jan 1;9(1–2):79–105.
56.
Davis LJ. Enforcing normalcy: disability, deafness, and the body. London: Verso; 1995.
57.
Davis, Lennard J., 1949-. Enforcing normalcy: disability, deafness, and the body [Internet]. Verso; 1995. Available from: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02823.0001.001
58.
McRuer R, Bérubé M. Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press; 2006.
59.
McRuer R, Bérubé MF. Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press; 2006.
60.
Elsaesser T, Hagener M. Film theory: an introduction through the senses. 2. ed. New York: Routledge; 2015.
61.
Elsaesser T, Hagener M. Film theory: an introduction through the senses. 2nd ed. New York, New York: Routledge; 2015.
62.
Klinger B. The art film, affect and the female viewer: The Piano revisited. Screen. 2006 Jan 1;47(1):19–41.
63.
Laine T. Feeling cinema: emotional dynamics in film studies. Paperback ed. New York: Bloomsbury; 2013.
64.
Sinnerbrink R. Stimmung: exploring the aesthetics of mood. Screen. 2012 Jun 1;53(2):148–163.
65.
French S, Shacklock Z. The affective sublime in Lars von Trier’s and Terrence Malick’s. New Review of Film and Television Studies. 2014 Oct 2;12(4):339–356.
66.
Marks LU. The skin of the film: intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2000.
67.
Marks LU. The skin of the film: intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2000. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=1167652
68.
Barker JM. The tactile eye: touch and the cinematic experience. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press;
69.
Barker, Jennifer M., 1969-. The tactile eye: touch and the cinematic experience [Internet]. University of California Press; 2009. Available from: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb08197.0001.001
70.
Laine T. Bodies in pain: emotion and the cinema of Darren Aronofsky. New York: Berghahn Books; 2015.
71.
Laine T. Bodies in pain: emotion and the cinema of Darren Aronofsky [Internet]. New York, New York: berghahn; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bham/detail.action?docID=1707815
